compare
Airbyte vs DataX
The same facts for both, read from GitHub every night, and the relation a person reviewed.
| Fact | Airbyte | DataX |
|---|---|---|
| Language | Python | Java |
| Licence | Other | Other |
| Stars | 22k | 17k |
| Latest | v2.0.0 | datax_v202309 |
| Last push | 2026-10-06 | 2026-07-07 |
| Release cadence | about 60 days between releases | about 74 days between releases |
| Active contributors | 19+ commit authors on the default branch in the last 90 days | 0 commit authors on the default branch in the last 90 days |
| Flags | none | none |
How they relate
Both replace Fivetran. Alternatives to Fivetran →
Full replacementAirbyteHundreds of connectors syncing sources into warehouses, and a builder for new ones.
PartialDataXBatch sync between databases, warehouses and file stores through reader and writer plugins; no SaaS connectors or scheduler.
Airbyte
DataX
- datax_v2023092023-09-13支持Phoenix 同步数据添加 where条件
- datax_v2023082023-08-13OTS 插件更新
- datax_v2023062023-07-18新增插件
- datax_v2023032023-03-23新增插件
- datax_v2022102022-10-27涉及通道能力更新(OceanBase、TDengine、Doris等),具体如下:
Airbyte
✓ signed The latest release, v2.0.0, carries a signature GitHub verified.
Loading the security report
DataX
✓ signed The latest release, datax_v202309, carries a signature GitHub verified.
Loading the security report