compare
arq vs Hatchet
The same facts for both, read from GitHub every night, and the relation a person reviewed.
| Fact | arq | Hatchet |
|---|---|---|
| Language | Python | Go |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Stars | 3k | 8.1k |
| Latest | v0.28.0 | v0.110.5 |
| Last push | 2026-04-16 | 2026-10-06 |
| Release cadence | about 82 days between releases | about 1 day between releases |
| Active contributors | 0 commit authors on the default branch in the last 90 days | 19 commit authors on the default branch in the last 90 days |
| Flags | none | none |
How they relate
Both replace Celery. Alternatives to Celery →
PartialarqAsync jobs for asyncio code, over Redis only.
PartialHatchetTasks and durable workflows on a Postgres-backed engine you run yourself, with SDKs for Python, TypeScript and Go.
arq
arq
unsigned The latest release, v0.28.0, carries no signature GitHub could verify.
Loading the security report
Hatchet
unsigned The latest release, v0.110.5, carries no signature GitHub could verify.
Loading the security report