compare
Conjur vs Infisical
The same facts for both, read from GitHub every night, and the relation a person reviewed.
| Fact | Conjur | Infisical |
|---|---|---|
| Language | Ruby | TypeScript |
| Licence | Other | Other |
| Stars | 952 | 30k |
| Latest | v1.27.0 | v0.165.17 |
| Last push | 2026-07-14 | 2026-10-06 |
| Release cadence | about 60 days between releases | about 2 days between releases |
| Active contributors | 1 commit author on the default branch in the last 90 days | 21+ commit authors on the default branch in the last 90 days |
| Flags | none | none |
How they relate
Both replace HashiCorp Vault. Alternatives to HashiCorp Vault →
PartialConjurMachine identities and secrets for applications, Kubernetes and CI, with policies as code.
PartialInfisicalApplication secrets and environment sync, not a general PKI or encryption service.
Conjur
Infisical
- v0.165.172026-10-05chore: add upgrade impact for v0.165.16 by @github-actions[bot] in
- v0.165.162026-09-23feat: block certificate deletion until expiry
- v0.165.152026-09-22fix(agent-vault): expose agent vault routes in the openapi spec
- v0.165.142026-09-21chore: add upgrade impact for v0.165.13 by @github-actions[bot] in
- v0.165.132026-09-18feat(analytics): track paywall-to-billing funnel
Conjur
unsigned The latest release, v1.27.0, carries no signature GitHub could verify.
Loading the security report
Infisical
✓ signed The latest release, v0.165.17, carries a signature GitHub verified.
Loading the security report