compare
Dokploy vs Piku
The same facts for both, read from GitHub every night, and the relation a person reviewed.
| Fact | Dokploy | Piku |
|---|---|---|
| Language | TypeScript | Python |
| Licence | Other | MIT |
| Stars | 38k | 6.6k |
| Latest | v0.30.8 | v1.0.0 |
| Last push | 2026-10-05 | 2026-09-04 |
| Release cadence | about 8 days between releases | too few releases |
| Active contributors | 38+ commit authors on the default branch in the last 90 days | 4 commit authors on the default branch in the last 90 days |
| Flags | none | none |
How they relate
Both replace Heroku. Alternatives to Heroku →
Full replacementDokployBuilds from git with Nixpacks, Railpack, Heroku or Paketo buildpacks or a Dockerfile, with managed databases and backups.
PartialPikuGit push deploys with a Procfile and an ENV file on a single server, built per language without buildpacks or managed databases.
Dokploy
- v0.30.82026-09-29
- v0.30.72026-09-18feat: added missing Railpack versions
- v0.30.62026-09-08test: fix CI failures and improve test robustness
- v0.30.52026-09-02Cloud onboarding wizard, billing trial card, and post-checkout server setup
- v0.30.42026-09-01fix: improve responsive layout for application logs page
Dokploy
unsigned The latest release, v0.30.8, carries no signature GitHub could verify.
Loading the security report
Piku
✓ signed The latest release, v1.0.0, carries a signature GitHub verified.
Loading the security report