compare
Doom Emacs vs Lapce
The same facts for both, read from GitHub every night, and the relation a person reviewed.
| Fact | Doom Emacs | Lapce |
|---|---|---|
| Language | Emacs Lisp | Rust |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Stars | 23k | 39k |
| Latest | v2.2.4 | v0.4.6 |
| Last push | 2026-11-06 | 2026-10-09 |
| Release cadence | too few releases | about 64 days between releases |
| Active contributors | 7 commit authors on the default branch in the last 90 days | 4 commit authors on the default branch in the last 90 days |
| Flags | none | none |
How they relate
Both replace Visual Studio Code. Alternatives to Visual Studio Code →
PartialDoom EmacsAn Emacs configuration with LSP, git and project navigation; keyboard-driven, with a smaller extension pool.
PartialLapceNative editor with language servers and a plugin system of its own, without VS Code's extensions.
Doom Emacs
This repository publishes tags, not GitHub releases.
Doom Emacs
✓ signed The latest release, v2.2.4, carries a signature GitHub verified.
Loading the security report
Lapce
✓ signed The latest release, v0.4.6, carries a signature GitHub verified.
Loading the security report