compare
Doom Emacs vs LazyVim
The same facts for both, read from GitHub every night, and the relation a person reviewed.
| Fact | Doom Emacs | LazyVim |
|---|---|---|
| Language | Emacs Lisp | Lua |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Stars | 23k | 28k |
| Latest | v2.2.4 | v16.0.2 |
| Last push | 2026-11-06 | 2026-11-08 |
| Release cadence | too few releases | about 61 days between releases |
| Active contributors | 7 commit authors on the default branch in the last 90 days | 5 commit authors on the default branch in the last 90 days |
| Flags | none | none |
How they relate
Both replace Visual Studio Code. Alternatives to Visual Studio Code →
PartialDoom EmacsAn Emacs configuration with LSP, git and project navigation; keyboard-driven, with a smaller extension pool.
PartialLazyVimA Neovim distribution with LSP, completion, git and a file explorer set up; terminal-based, with fewer extensions.
Doom Emacs
This repository publishes tags, not GitHub releases.
LazyVim
- v16.0.22026-11-08haskell: prevent mason-lspconfig from starting hls (#7147) (92239bc)
- v16.0.12026-09-08nvim-lint: fix prepend_args logic (#7105) (2239177)
- v16.0.02026-06-02refactoring: conform to upstream breaking changes on 2.0 branch (#7124)
- v15.15.02026-04-02biome: enable biome lsp for linting (b2830cf)
- v15.14.02026-03-01bufferline: add <leader>bj keymap for BufferLinePick (#6968) (a50072f)
Doom Emacs
✓ signed The latest release, v2.2.4, carries a signature GitHub verified.
Loading the security report
LazyVim
✓ signed The latest release, v16.0.2, carries a signature GitHub verified.
Loading the security report