compare
Fava vs hledger
The same facts for both, read from GitHub every night, and the relation a person reviewed.
| Fact | Fava | hledger |
|---|---|---|
| Language | Python | Haskell |
| Licence | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Stars | 2.6k | 4.7k |
| Latest | v1.30.16 | 1.52.4 |
| Last push | 2026-10-02 | 2026-10-04 |
| Release cadence | too few releases | too few releases |
| Active contributors | 9 commit authors on the default branch in the last 90 days | 6+ commit authors on the default branch in the last 90 days |
| Flags | none | none |
How they relate
Both replace Quicken. Alternatives to Quicken →
PartialFavaWeb interface for Beancount files with charts, reports, budgets and an editor; no bank sync.
PartialhledgerPlain text double-entry accounting with command-line, terminal and web interfaces, compatible with Ledger journals.
Fava
This repository publishes tags, not GitHub releases.
hledger
- 1.99.52026-10-02(2.0 preview 5)pre-release
- test-arm64-cifs2026-09-26Test build: linux arm64, CIFS redirect fixpre-release
- 1.99.42026-09-11(2.0 preview 4)pre-release
- 1.52.42026-09-10hledger-web packaging fixes for stackage; misc dependency and doc updates
- 1.52.32026-08-27Uses hledger-lib 1.52.3.
Fava
✓ signed The latest release, v1.30.16, carries a signature GitHub verified.
Loading the security report
hledger
✓ signed The latest release, 1.52.4, carries a signature GitHub verified.
Loading the security report