compare
IntelOwl vs OpenCTI
The same facts for both, read from GitHub every night, and the relation a person reviewed.
| Fact | IntelOwl | OpenCTI |
|---|---|---|
| Language | Python | TypeScript |
| Licence | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Stars | 4.8k | 10k |
| Latest | v6.8.0 | 7.261016.0 |
| Last push | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Release cadence | about 59 days between releases | about 4 days between releases |
| Active contributors | 5 commit authors on the default branch in the last 90 days | 38+ commit authors on the default branch in the last 90 days |
| Flags | none | none |
How they relate
Both replace Recorded Future. Alternatives to Recorded Future →
PartialIntelOwlEnriches an IP, domain, hash or URL with dozens of analyzers in one request; the data comes from services you configure.
PartialOpenCTIKnowledge graph of threat actors, malware and indicators with connectors for feeds; no proprietary intelligence collection.
IntelOwl
OpenCTI
- 7.261016.02026-10-16Version 7.261016.0
- 7.261014.02026-10-14Version 7.261014.0
- 7.261008.02026-10-09Version 7.261008.0
- 7.260309.0-lts.82026-10-07Version 7.260309.0-lts.8
- 7.261002.02026-10-02Version 7.261002.0
IntelOwl
✓ signed The latest release, v6.8.0, carries a signature GitHub verified.
Loading the security report
OpenCTI
✓ signed The latest release, 7.261016.0, carries a signature GitHub verified.
Loading the security report