compare
La Suite Meet vs MiroTalk SFU
The same facts for both, read from GitHub every night, and the relation a person reviewed.
| Fact | La Suite Meet | MiroTalk SFU |
|---|---|---|
| Language | Python | JavaScript |
| Licence | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Stars | 2.4k | 3.1k |
| Latest | v1.32.1 | none |
| Last push | 2026-10-06 | 2026-10-06 |
| Release cadence | about 6 days between releases | too few releases |
| Active contributors | 20 commit authors on the default branch in the last 90 days | 2 commit authors on the default branch in the last 90 days |
| Flags | none | No release or tag |
How they relate
Both replace Zoom. Alternatives to Zoom →
Full replacementLa Suite MeetVideo meetings in the browser, built on LiveKit.
PartialMiroTalk SFUBrowser meetings through a mediasoup SFU, with recording, whiteboard and screen sharing, for larger groups than MiroTalk P2P.
La Suite Meet
- v1.32.12026-09-25🔒️(backend) fix CVE-2026-73228 and CVE-2026-73229 in drf
- v1.32.02026-09-25We welcome @briquet, a new maintainer 🚀
- v1.31.02026-09-08✨(frontend) add 1080p sending resolution option #1660
- v1.30.02026-09-01Recordings were previously confirmed as saved by an S3 storage-event webhook posting to /api/v1.0/recordings/storage-ho…
- v1.29.02026-08-26✨(any) let any authenticated user manage the lobby on trusted rooms
MiroTalk SFU
This repository publishes tags, not GitHub releases.
La Suite Meet
unsigned The latest release, v1.32.1, carries no signature GitHub could verify.
Loading the security report
MiroTalk SFU
No release or tag to check a signature on.
Loading the security report