compare
Material for MkDocs vs Typemill
The same facts for both, read from GitHub every night, and the relation a person reviewed.
| Fact | Material for MkDocs | Typemill |
|---|---|---|
| Language | Python | JavaScript |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Stars | 28k | 620 |
| Latest | 9.7.7 | v2.27.0 |
| Last push | 2026-10-02 | 2026-09-20 |
| Release cadence | about 8 days between releases | about 17 days between releases |
| Active contributors | 3 commit authors on the default branch in the last 90 days | 1 commit author on the default branch in the last 90 days |
| Flags | none | none |
How they relate
Both replace GitBook. Alternatives to GitBook →
Full replacementMaterial for MkDocsDocumentation site built from Markdown in your repository, with search.
PartialTypemillFlat-file Markdown sites for manuals and documentation, with a browser editor.
Material for MkDocs
Material for MkDocs
✓ signed The latest release, 9.7.7, carries a signature GitHub verified.
Loading the security report
Typemill
unsigned The latest release, v2.27.0, carries no signature GitHub could verify.
Loading the security report