compare
Nhost vs Supabase
The same facts for both, read from GitHub every night, and the relation a person reviewed.
| Fact | Nhost | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Language | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Stars | 9.3k | 111k |
| Latest | cli@1.51.2 | v1.26.08 |
| Last push | 2026-10-06 | 2026-10-06 |
| Release cadence | about 1 day between releases | about 32 days between releases |
| Active contributors | 18 commit authors on the default branch in the last 90 days | 96+ commit authors on the default branch in the last 90 days |
| Flags | none | none |
How they relate
Both replace Firebase. Alternatives to Firebase →
Full replacementNhostPostgres with a GraphQL API through Hasura, auth, storage and serverless functions.
Full replacementSupabasePostgres with auth, storage, realtime, edge functions and generated APIs.
Nhost
- cli@1.51.22026-09-30(cli) Bump references to 1.51.1
- postgres@20260930-12026-09-30
- @nhost/nhost-js@4.9.02026-09-30(auth) Add SMS deanonymization and phone number changes (#4576)
- @nhost/stripe-graphql-js@1.4.02026-09-30(landing) Wire into monorepo build & deploy pipeline
- storage@0.15.12026-09-30(docs) Align specs with reality (#4632)
Nhost
✓ signed The latest release, cli@1.51.2, carries a signature GitHub verified.
Loading the security report
Supabase
✓ signed The latest release, v1.26.08, carries a signature GitHub verified.
Loading the security report