compare
Airbyte vs Apache SeaTunnel
The same facts for both, read from GitHub every night, and the relation a person reviewed.
| Fact | Airbyte | Apache SeaTunnel |
|---|---|---|
| Language | Python | Java |
| Licence | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Stars | 22k | 9.7k |
| Latest | v2.0.0 | v3.0.0 |
| Last push | 2026-10-06 | 2026-10-06 |
| Release cadence | about 60 days between releases | about 146 days between releases |
| Active contributors | 19+ commit authors on the default branch in the last 90 days | 98+ commit authors on the default branch in the last 90 days |
| Flags | none | none |
How they relate
Both replace Fivetran. Alternatives to Fivetran →
Full replacementAirbyteHundreds of connectors syncing sources into warehouses, and a builder for new ones.
PartialApache SeaTunnelBatch and streaming sync across databases, warehouses and SaaS sources, run on its own engine, Flink or Spark.
Airbyte
Airbyte
✓ signed The latest release, v2.0.0, carries a signature GitHub verified.
Loading the security report
Apache SeaTunnel
unsigned The latest release, v3.0.0, carries no signature GitHub could verify.
Loading the security report