compare
bbolt vs redb
The same facts for both, read from GitHub every night, and the relation a person reviewed.
| Fact | bbolt | redb |
|---|---|---|
| Language | Go | Rust |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Stars | 9.8k | 4.9k |
| Latest | v1.5.0 | v4.4.0 |
| Last push | 2026-10-16 | 2026-10-18 |
| Release cadence | about 35 days between releases | about 23 days between releases |
| Active contributors | 7 commit authors on the default branch in the last 90 days | 4 commit authors on the default branch in the last 90 days |
| Flags | none | none |
How they relate
redb replaces bbolt. Alternatives to bbolt →
Full replacementCopy-on-write B-tree key-value store with ACID transactions, in Rust instead of Go.
Both replace RocksDB. Alternatives to RocksDB →
PartialbboltB+tree key-value store in Go with ACID transactions, suited to read-heavy workloads rather than heavy writes.
PartialredbEmbedded key-value store in pure Rust with ACID transactions, without LSM-tree write throughput.
bbolt
bbolt
✓ signed The latest release, v1.5.0, carries a signature GitHub verified.
Loading the security report
redb
unsigned The latest release, v4.4.0, carries no signature GitHub could verify.
Loading the security report