compare
ezBookkeeping vs Fava
The same facts for both, read from GitHub every night, and the relation a person reviewed.
| Fact | ezBookkeeping | Fava |
|---|---|---|
| Language | Go | Python |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Stars | 5.7k | 2.6k |
| Latest | v2.0.1 | v1.30.16 |
| Last push | 2026-10-06 | 2026-10-02 |
| Release cadence | about 29 days between releases | too few releases |
| Active contributors | 12 commit authors on the default branch in the last 90 days | 9 commit authors on the default branch in the last 90 days |
| Flags | none | none |
How they relate
Both replace Quicken. Alternatives to Quicken →
PartialezBookkeepingSelf-hosted transaction tracking that imports Quicken's QIF and QFX files, without investments or budgets.
PartialFavaWeb interface for Beancount files with charts, reports, budgets and an editor; no bank sync.
ezBookkeeping
unsigned The latest release, v2.0.1, carries no signature GitHub could verify.
Loading the security report
Fava
✓ signed The latest release, v1.30.16, carries a signature GitHub verified.
Loading the security report