compare
GitBucket vs Harness Open Source
The same facts for both, read from GitHub every night, and the relation a person reviewed.
| Fact | GitBucket | Harness Open Source |
|---|---|---|
| Language | Scala | Go |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Stars | 9.4k | 38k |
| Latest | 4.48.0 | v2.28.2 |
| Last push | 2026-10-05 | 2026-10-06 |
| Release cadence | about 40 days between releases | about 16 days between releases |
| Active contributors | 4 commit authors on the default branch in the last 90 days | 15 commit authors on the default branch in the last 90 days |
| Flags | none | none |
How they relate
Both replace GitHub. Alternatives to GitHub →
PartialGitBucketRepositories, issues, pull requests and a GitHub-compatible API on the JVM, without built-in CI.
Full replacementHarness Open SourceRepositories, pull requests, pipelines and artifact registries on your own server, with pipelines in its own format.
GitBucket
unsigned The latest release, 4.48.0, carries no signature GitHub could verify.
Loading the security report
Harness Open Source
unsigned The latest release, v2.28.2, carries no signature GitHub could verify.
Loading the security report