compare
GitBucket vs Soft Serve
The same facts for both, read from GitHub every night, and the relation a person reviewed.
| Fact | GitBucket | Soft Serve |
|---|---|---|
| Language | Scala | Go |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Stars | 9.4k | 7.2k |
| Latest | 4.48.0 | v0.12.3 |
| Last push | 2026-10-05 | 2026-10-05 |
| Release cadence | about 40 days between releases | about 31 days between releases |
| Active contributors | 4 commit authors on the default branch in the last 90 days | 12 commit authors on the default branch in the last 90 days |
| Flags | none | none |
How they relate
Both replace GitHub. Alternatives to GitHub →
PartialGitBucketRepositories, issues, pull requests and a GitHub-compatible API on the JVM, without built-in CI.
PartialSoft ServeRepositories served over SSH, HTTP and the git protocol with a terminal UI, without a web interface or pull requests.
Soft Serve
- v0.12.32026-10-05This release fixes three security issues reported by @sondt99 and @Xiaoyiyi23.
- v0.12.22026-08-07This release fixes a security issue reported by @andrinoff. Please upgrade.
- v0.12.12026-08-04This release fixes a security issue reported by @xmsama.
- v0.12.02026-08-01This release fixes five security issues, one of them critical. Please upgrade.
- v0.11.62026-03-19Fix LFS import local repository security issue that allows importing private repositories the users don't have access t…
GitBucket
unsigned The latest release, 4.48.0, carries no signature GitHub could verify.
Loading the security report
Soft Serve
✓ signed The latest release, v0.12.3, carries a signature GitHub verified.
Loading the security report