compare

GitBucket vs Soft Serve

The same facts for both, read from GitHub every night, and the relation a person reviewed.

GitBucket vs Soft Serve
FactGitBucketSoft Serve
LanguageScalaGo
LicenceApache-2.0MIT
Stars9.4k7.2k
Latest4.48.0v0.12.3
Last push2026-10-052026-10-05
Release cadenceabout 40 days between releasesabout 31 days between releases
Active contributors4 commit authors on the default branch in the last 90 days12 commit authors on the default branch in the last 90 days
Flagsnonenone
  • Both replace GitHub. Alternatives to GitHub →

    PartialGitBucketRepositories, issues, pull requests and a GitHub-compatible API on the JVM, without built-in CI.

    PartialSoft ServeRepositories served over SSH, HTTP and the git protocol with a terminal UI, without a web interface or pull requests.