compare
OTOBO vs Request Tracker
The same facts for both, read from GitHub every night, and the relation a person reviewed.
| Fact | OTOBO | Request Tracker |
|---|---|---|
| Language | Perl | Perl |
| Licence | GPL-3.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Stars | 336 | 1.2k |
| Latest | rel-11_0_18 | rt-6.0.3 |
| Last push | 2026-10-06 | 2026-10-05 |
| Release cadence | too few releases | about 1 day between releases |
| Active contributors | 17+ commit authors on the default branch in the last 90 days | 5 commit authors on the default branch in the last 90 days |
| Flags | none | none |
How they relate
Both replace Zendesk. Alternatives to Zendesk →
PartialOTOBOTickets from email, phone and a customer portal, with queues and SLAs.
PartialRequest TrackerEmail-driven tickets with queues, custom fields, scrips and a self-service portal.
OTOBO
unsigned The latest release, rel-11_0_18, carries no signature GitHub could verify.
Loading the security report
Request Tracker
✓ signed The latest release, rt-6.0.3, carries a signature GitHub verified.
Loading the security report